Friday, August 10, 2007

Why no 'Rush?'

Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker are back, but what took them so long? It's the most interesting question surrounding "Rush Hour 3," a pedestrian sequel hitting theaters today that was six years in the making.
For a full examination, check out my review:

http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070810/ENTERTAINMENT/108100001/1007

1 Comments:

At August 10, 2007 9:45 AM , Blogger Chase Squires said...

Isn't Jackie Chan, like, in his sixties? He's gonna break a hip doing that stuff ...

(personally, I'd rather drink from a spittoon than watch this schlock) ... btw, nice MadMen last night, followed by another rollicking good time in Burn Notice ... TV is offering much better entertainment than the movies.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

DVD OF THE WEEK

"The Great Debaters"

Next week:

"Penn & Teller - Bullsh%@ Fifth Season,"

"National Treasure 2: Book of Secrets"

NEW IN THEATERS 5/16

"The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian"

"Fugitive Pieces"
(limited)

HAIKU of the Week

IRON MAN

Downey dons steel suit

Smites villains, his own bad rap

A hero is born

Site Map