Why no 'Rush?'
Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker are back, but what took them so long? It's the most interesting question surrounding "Rush Hour 3," a pedestrian sequel hitting theaters today that was six years in the making.
For a full examination, check out my review:
http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070810/ENTERTAINMENT/108100001/1007






Site Map
1 Comments:
Isn't Jackie Chan, like, in his sixties? He's gonna break a hip doing that stuff ...
(personally, I'd rather drink from a spittoon than watch this schlock) ... btw, nice MadMen last night, followed by another rollicking good time in Burn Notice ... TV is offering much better entertainment than the movies.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home