I'm Tom Hanks and I approved this message ...
I realized late in the game just how good an actor Tom Hanks really is. I needed "Cast Away" to open my eyes - which perhaps doesn't speak well of my ability to spot major talent.
BECAUSE NO ONE SHOULD WASTE TWO GOOD HOURS IN THE DARK
I realized late in the game just how good an actor Tom Hanks really is. I needed "Cast Away" to open my eyes - which perhaps doesn't speak well of my ability to spot major talent.
"The Great Debaters"
Next week:
"Penn & Teller - Bullsh%@ Fifth Season,""National Treasure 2: Book of Secrets"
"The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian"
"Fugitive Pieces"
(limited)
IRON MAN
Downey dons steel suit
Smites villains, his own bad rap
A hero is born
Site Map
6 Comments:
Maybe Tom Hanks thinks of himself first as an American, and then an actor. And what's wrong with an American saying, "I think this person would be the best leader for my country"? Maybe, like a lot of us, he's dismayed about what's happened over the past eight years. And if he thinks that his stance might carry some weight -- as it surely did with the ill-conceived WWII Memorial on the National Mall -- then, well, OK. His endorsement isn't without personal risk, since a lot of folks (and it sounds like you're among them) will be put off by it. How many of the rest of us can say that?
If Hanks were asked a question in an interview and he said, "I'm backing Obama," in response, that would be one thing. But he's trying to elevate himself into a spokesman based on his acting fame, not on anything else. He risks alienating more than half of his fans ... both Republicans and Hillary boosters, and maybe for him the risk of that doesn't outweigh what he thinks the positive aspect of his endorsement might be.
I just can't imagine folks being swayed by his endorsement.
I think backing a WWII Memorial is far less divise and far more unifying than getting your hands dirty with politics.
But thanks for weighing in. It's a really complex subject.
I wish it were the other way around: I wish politicians would endorse actors, or maybe just endorse movies. Think how much we'd learn about them -- at least until their advisors taught them how to advantageously position themselves by their endorsements. Imagine Clinton endorsing Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Garcia until she was hastily advised to switch her favorite movie choice to Pork Chop Hill.
Voters are notoriously NOT swayed by endorsements. Readers, movie goers and other consumers, yes. But not voters. Inexplicable but true. So, really? Who cares? Tom Hanks has a very public and very broad soap box. Thank god he's using it for something he believes in. Because the alternative-- Paris Hilton using her celebrity to save drunken elephants or whatever the hell that was all about-- is far, far worse. Also, I had to comment on one other thing: Beautiful Girls is an awesome, underrated movie. Timothy Hutton is superb. And the soundtrack is amazing.
Kevin,
Yes, pols revealing their honest to goodness fave films would be potentially illuminating
Karmatee,
If Paris actually poured her $$ and fame into a bona fide good cause, I'd say, 'more power to her.' Until that time I'm suspicious.
And "Beautiful Girls" is an all-time favorite of mine. What a buried gem. The bond between Hutton and Portman is one of the more complex relationships I've ever seen on screen.
LOL!
Yeah, I pretty much think actors should shut up and act, but I think that has already been said and written. I could care less who they endorse, I just care whether they can deliver a line.
Kevin: yes, politicians should endorse actors and then when Bush endorsed Pauly Shore, we'll have known what we were in for.
Personally, I'm endorsing my German Shepherd (Xena Von Adel Haus Schlaefer) for President. She's smarter than most people I know and her only bad habbit is liking HER OWN butt.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home